The cheapest mid-range is more interesting than ever, and it is not that we say so, it is that you just have to see the price and the features offered by phones that have a fairly affordable cost. This is the case of the Redmi 9T and the Motorola Moto G30 , two phones that we face today to find out which one is better to buy today.
Without a doubt, these two phones can offer us everything we need on a day-to-day basis for a more than adjusted price. We face them to find out why each one stands out and therefore which of the two is more interesting to buy.
Screen and dimensions
We are facing two phones with quite different screens, especially in resolution. That of the Redmi 9T is 6.53 inches with Full HD + resolution , while that of the Moto G30 is 6.5 inches with HD + resolution , but in return it offers us a refresh rate of 90Hz , which gives it a special appeal.
They both have a drop-shaped notch. The dimensions of the Redmi are 162.3 x 77.3 x 9.6 mm, with a weight of 198 grams. While the Motorola is somewhat larger, with dimensions of 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm and a weight of 200 grams.
Anapa, Russia – August 10, 2019: Woman hand holding iPhone X with Apple Pay Cash on the screen and pay pass online terminal. iPhone was created and developed by the Apple inc .; Shutterstock ID 1498531676; Purchase Order: –
Power and performance
These two phones have many similarities in this regard, so many that they share the same processor. This is a Snapdragon 662 , which is accompanied by 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage in the Redmi and 4GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, expandable in both cases.
Therefore in this case the Moto has a lot of advantage, since it has twice the internal storage, which is very good and is more than enough.
Camera
Here both phones are only alike in the number of rear sensors, which is four. In the Moto we have a main sensor of 48 megapixels and aperture f / 1.8, as well as an ultra-wide angle of 8 megapixels and aperture f / 2.2, a macro of 2 megapixels with aperture of f / 2.4, as well as a depth of 2 megapixels with aperture of f / 2.4.
In the case of Motorola, we have more resolution in the main sensor, 64 megapixels with an aperture of f / 1.7, and it is accompanied by an ultra wide angle of 8 megapixels f / 2.2, a macro of 2 megapixels f / 2.4 and a depth one. f / 2.4. Video recording is Full HD at 30fps on the Redmi 9T, and Full HD at 30fps or 60fps in the case of the Moto G30 . In front, the selfie camera of the Redmi is 8 megapixels with aperture of f / 2.1, while that of the Moto is 13 megapixels with aperture f / 2.2, so it has more resolution.
Battery, connectivity and software
In this regard we have undoubtedly a clear winner, which is the Redmi with its huge 6000mAh battery and 18W fast charging. Less capacity has that of the Moto, with 5000mAh and a slightly faster charge of 20W. Both have Bluetooth 5.0, GPS, NFC to make mobile payments in establishments, FM Radio and USB type C connector.
In addition, the Redmi as usual offers an infrared port to control other devices remotely. The Redmi’s software is Android 10 under MIUI 12 , while the Motorola’s is Android 11 under its thin layer that is quite similar to stock Android.
Price and conclusion
We are facing two excellent mid-range models, which stand out in different aspects. The price of the Redmi 9T is currently around 159 euros, while that of the Moto G30 is 199 euros. A price difference that can be critical, although it is true that the Motorola stands out in many respects. Like for example the screen , with those 90Hz refresh rate. As well as the cameras , which have more resolution, both in the rear and in the front.
For its part, the Redmi stands out for a screen that is Full HD, and especially for a huge 6000mAh battery, which is one of the largest currently available, although in this aspect the Moto is not badly equipped either. Therefore, if you give importance to photography, without a doubt the most advisable thing is to get the new Motorola. If this aspect is not so important, the Redmi should be your choice, since it offers more autonomy, and a higher resolution screen, something key since it is a component that we use for many hours a day, and the difference is noticeable, more having a difference of 40 euros between the two.
